Turn Bills into kWh
Overview
A common issue that new energy companies run into when analyzing a potential project is that they need to know how much electricity a home or business is using but cannot get access to meter data or good-quality usage numbers. Most customers don't know how much electricity they're using. They may have some idea of how much they pay for electricity, but they have no idea how that translates into kWh.
The Arcadia API has just the tool for this job: the Bill Solve option in our On-Demand Cost Calculator. With this option, you can estimate a customer's energy usage for a single billing period using just the total cost of their bill. Similarly, if your customer knows their annual electricity cost, Bill Solve can estimate their annual kWh consumption as well.
Our Account Cost Calculator supports these Bill Solve calculations.
How Bill Solve Works
Bill Solve estimates kWh usage by working backward from total bill amounts. It applies the correct tariff rates and structures for the specified billing period, determining how much energy consumption (kWh) would have been required to generate the given bill total.
While Bill Solve provides both monthly and annual estimation options, we recommend using the monthly option with exact billing dates for the highest precision. The annual option requires assumptions about how a customer's usage is distributed over the year, which can introduce additional uncertainty.
What Bill Solve Does Well
Bill Solve is designed to work best with straightforward electricity tariffs, particularly those with fixed rate structures.
✅ Supports Standard Tiered Tariffs
- Works well when a tariff has clearly defined, fixed kWh tiers (e.g., 0–500 kWh, 501–1000 kWh, etc.).
- Best suited for cases where energy charges are the main component of the bill and do not fluctuate due to demand-based adjustments.
✅ Handles Time-of-Use (TOU) Rates
- Can estimate kWh distribution across fixed TOU windows (e.g., Off-Peak: 10 PM – 6 AM, On-Peak: 2 PM – 7 PM).
- Ideal when TOU rates are the primary driver of bill variation and demand-based components are minimal.
✅ Accounts for Basic Fixed Fees & Simple Demand Charges
- Handles fixed monthly fees and basic demand charges that do not influence energy tier breakpoints.
- Works best when demand charges follow a fixed structure and do not introduce historical dependencies.
When Bill Solve May Not Be a Good Fit
While Bill Solve is a great tool for estimating usage under most standard tariff structures, it may not provide accurate results for tariffs with complex, demand-based, or historical pricing rules.
🚫 Tariffs with Demand-Dependent Tiering
- If the kWh tier structure changes based on a customer's peak demand history, Bill Solve cannot correctly allocate usage across those tiers.
- Example: A tariff where the second tier starts at 80% of the customer’s highest demand in the past 12 months—Bill Solve does not track historical demand, so it cannot determine the correct tier placement.
🚫 Complex Demand Charges That Influence kWh Allocation
- Some tariffs adjust kWh rates based on measured demand (e.g., higher per-kWh pricing for high-demand customers).
- Bill Solve assumes a standard energy rate structure and does not model demand-based rate shifts.
🚫 Ratchet-Based Pricing or Dynamic Tiering
- If a tariff includes historical peak demand ratchets (e.g., where past demand affects current pricing), Bill Solve does not retain past demand values and may misplace consumption into incorrect rate categories.
When to Use Bill Solve vs. Alternative Methods
✅ Use Bill Solve if your tariff has clear, fixed kWh tiers and TOU periods, and you need an approximate usage estimate.
⚠️ Consider Alternative Methods if your tariff includes demand-based pricing, historical ratchets, or shifting tier structures.
If you're unsure whether Bill Solve is a good fit for your use case, feel free to reach out to our team for guidance.
Monthly Bill Solve Request
Here's an example of how the monthly option works. For this scenario, we have the following customer:
- Residential customer in Southern California Edison territory on the "D" tariff (
masterTariffId
447) - Actual bill of $51.76 for the period 2015-11-25 to 2015-12-28
To solve for this customer's monthly consumption value, we'll make the following call to the Account Cost Calculator:
POST /rest/v1/accounts/pid/sce-cust/calculate/
{
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28",
"billingPeriod": "true",
"propertyInputs": [
{
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28",
"keyName": "total",
"dataValue": "54.71",
"unit": "cost"
},
{
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28",
"keyName": "baselineType",
"dataValue": "typicalElectricity"
}
]
}
Let's break this down a little. Remember: you can see the full documentation for the Account Cost Calculator here.
Important Parameters
- Prior to this call, we've created an account called
sce-cust
that holds our customer's data. Most importantly, it has their ZIP code, their utility, and their tariff. In this case, the customer is on SCE's "D" tariff (masterTariffId
447). - We set our billing period with
fromDateTime
andtoDateTime
to2015-11-25
and2015-12-28
, respectively. To get the most accurate results, you'll want to make sure to use the actual dates on the bill. - We set
billingPeriod
totrue
, because we want to ensure monthly charges (if any) are considered in the calculation. - We have two entries in the
propertyInputs
array. These are the inputs to our calculation. The first one is the most important one. For the billing period, our customer's cost is $54.71, so we send in atotal
property with adataValue
of 54.71. We also need to set theunit
tocost
so the calculator knows we're talking dollars instead of kWh or kW. - The second input sets our initial guess of monthly consumption. Instead of choosing a particular value, I'm telling the API to use our database of typicals to set the first guess. This has two advantages: the typical profile should start out closer to the customer's actual usage, resulting in fewer guesses and a faster response. More importantly, it will give you fine-grained hourly data for your guess, resulting in more accurate results for TOU customers.
Running the Calculation
Once we've got our request set up, we run it. Here are the results:
{
"status": "success",
"count": 1,
"type": "CalculatedCost",
"results": [
{
"masterTariffId": 447,
"tariffName": "Domestic",
"totalCost": 54.97,
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25T00:00:00-08:00",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28T00:00:00-08:00",
"currency": "USD",
"summary": {
"subTotalCost": 54.97
"taxCost": 0,
"totalCost": 54.97,
"adjustedTotalCost": 55.07,
"kWh": 352.25,
"kW": 0.72
}
...
So according to our calculator, this customer's usage should be around 352 kWh for December. What happens if we run it in the other direction? We can use the following request to do just that:
POST /rest/v1/accounts/pid/sce-cust/calculate/
{
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28",
"billingPeriod": "true",
"propertyInputs": [
{
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28",
"keyName": "consumption",
"dataValue": "352"
}
]
}
The results of which are:
{
"status": "success",
"count": 1,
"type": "CalculatedCost",
"results": [
{
"masterTariffId": 447,
"tariffName": "Domestic",
"totalCost": 54.92,
"fromDateTime": "2015-11-25T00:00:00-08:00",
"toDateTime": "2015-12-28T00:00:00-08:00",
"currency": "USD",
"summary": {
"subTotalCost": 54.92,
"taxCost": 0,
"totalCost": 54.92,
"adjustedTotalCost": 55.02,
"kWh": 352,
"kW": 0
}
...
That's how a monthly Bill Solve request works but what if we want to find out consumption based on a year's electricity cost?
Annual Bill Solve Request
Switch users, you can use an annual bill solve request to turn your customer's annual cost to usage, and then run a Savings Analysis with annual usage to calculate solar savings.
Here's an example of how the annual option works. For this scenario, we have the following customer:
- Residential customer in Baltimore Gas & Electric's territory on the "R" tariff (
masterTariffId
674) - Estimated annual cost of $1700 for the period 2016-10-15 to 2017-10-15
To solve for this customer's annual consumption value, we'll make the following call:
POST /rest/v1/accounts/pid/bge-cust/calculate/
{
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15",
"billingPeriod": "false",
"propertyInputs": [
{
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15",
"keyName": "total",
"dataValue": "1700",
"unit": "cost"
},
{
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15",
"keyName": "baselineType",
"dataValue": "typicalElectricity"
}
]
}
Important Parameters
- For this example, we've created an account called
bge-cust
that holds our customer's data. Like the first example, it has their ZIP code, their utility, and their tariff. In this case, the customer is on BG&E's "R" tariff (masterTariffId
674). - We set our billing period with
fromDateTime
andtoDateTime
to2016-10-15
and2017-10-15
, respectively. As with monthly bill solve, using the day of the month from the bill will improve precision. - We set
billingPeriod
tofalse
, because this calculation will include many billing periods, not one. This is important for tariffs that have fixed monthly charges. - We have two entries in the
propertyInputs
array. These are the inputs to our calculation. The first one is the most important one. For the billing period, our customer's cost is $1700, so we send in atotal
property with adataValue
of 1700. We also need to set theunit
tocost
so the calculator knows we're talking dollars instead of kWh or kW. - The second input sets our initial guess of monthly consumption. Instead of choosing a particular value, I'm telling the API to use our database of typicals to set the first guess. This has two advantages: the typical profile should start out closer to the customer's actual usage, resulting in fewer guesses and a faster response. More importantly, it will give you fine-grained hourly data for your guess, resulting in more accurate results for TOU customers.
Running the Calculation
Once we've got our request set up, we run it. Here are the results:
{
"status": "success",
"count": 1,
"type": "CalculatedCost",
"results":[
{
"masterTariffId": 674,
"tariffName": "Residential",
"totalCost": 1702.21,
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15T00:00:00-04:00",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15T00:00:00-04:00",
"currency": "USD",
"summary": {
"subTotalCost": 1702.21,
"taxCost": 0,
"totalCost": 1702.21,
"adjustedTotalCost": 1702.21,
"kWh": 11108.53,
"kW": 3.75
}
...
So according to our calculator, this customer's usage should be around 11109 kWh for a year starting in mid-October of 2016. What happens if we run it in the other direction? We can use the following request to do just that:
POST /rest/v1/accounts/pid/bge-cust/calculate/
{
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15",
"billingPeriod": "false",
"propertyInputs": [
{
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15",
"keyName": "consumption",
"dataValue": "11109"
}
]
}
The results of which are:
{
"status": "success",
"count": 1,
"type": "CalculatedCost",
"results": [
{
"masterTariffId": 674,
"tariffName": "Residential",
"totalCost": 1708.23,
"fromDateTime": "2016-10-15T00:00:00-04:00",
"toDateTime": "2017-10-15T00:00:00-04:00",
"currency": "USD",
"summary": {
"subTotalCost": 1708.23,
"taxCost": 0,
"totalCost": 1708.23,
"adjustedTotalCost": 1708.23,
"kWh": 11109,
"kW": 0
}
...
And that's it! Remember, calculating usage for one bill will yield more precise results than an annual calculation.
Updated 22 days ago